2LOY

Refined Miminal Constraint Solution NMR Structure of Translationally-controlled tumor protein (TCTP) from Caenorhabditis elegans, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium Target WR73


SOLUTION NMR
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-15N HSQC0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
22D 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
32D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
43D HNCO0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
53D HN(CA)CO0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
63D TROSY-HNCACB0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
73D TROSY-HN(CO)CACB0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
83D 1H-15N NOESY0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
93D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
103D 15N-15N-1H NOESY0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
113D 13C-13C-1H NOESY0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
123D 15N-13C-1H NOESY0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
133D 13C-15N-1H NOESY0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
143D C(CO)NH TOCSY0.822 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N; U-100% 2H; ILVFY-1H] WR73.009, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
152D 1H-13C HSQC high resolution0.85 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] WR73.004, 0.02 % NaN3, 10 mM DTT, 5 mM CaCL2, 100 mM NaCL, 1 x Proteinase Inhibitors, 20 mM MES, 50 uM DSS90% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
16NH J-MODULATION (RDC)0.6 mM [U-5% 13C; U-100% 15N] WR73.011, 11.55 mg/ml Pf1 phage, 12 mM MES, 400 mM NaCl, 6 mM DTT, 3 mM Cacl290% H2O/10% D2O6.5ambient298
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE800
2VarianINOVA600
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingTHE FINAL RDC-REFINED MINIMAL CONSTRAINT STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 970 CONFORMATIONALLY-RESTRICTING DISTANCE CONSTRAINTS, 293 DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS, 126 HYDROGEN BOND CONSTRAINTS, and 99 N-H RESIDUAL DIPOLAR COUPLINGS FROM A SINGLE ALIGNMENT IN PHAGE. (7.7 CONSTRAINTS PER RESIDUE, 2.3 LONG RANGE CONSTRAINTS PER RESIDUE, COMPUTED FOR RESIDUES 1 TO 183 BY PSVS 1.4). STRUCTURE DETERMINATION WAS PERFORMED ITERATIVELY USING CYANA 3.0. THE 20 FINAL STRUCTURES OUT OF 100 WITH THE LOWEST TARGET FUNCTION WERE FURTHER REFINED BY RESTRAINED MOLECULAR DYNAMICS/ENERGY MINIMIZATION IN EXPLICIT WATER (CNS) WITH PARAM19.CNS
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number100
Conformers Submitted Total Number20
Representative Model1 (lowest energy)
Additional NMR Experimental Information
DetailsTHE PROTEIN IS MONOMERIC AT 298 K BY 15N T1/T2 RELAXATION AND STATIC LIGHT SCATTERING. THE STRUCTURE IS A MINIMAL CONSTRAINT STRUCTURE DETERMINED USING TRIPLE RESONANCE NMR SPECTROSCOPY. ALL NOESY DATA WERE ACQUIRED AT 800 MHZ USING A 5-MM CRYOPROBE. BACKBONE ASSIGNMENTS WERE MADE USING PINE, AND THE SIDE CHAIN METHYL ASSIGNMENTS WERE COMPLETED MANUALLY. AUTOMATIC NOESY ASSIGNMENTS WERE DETERMINED USING CYANA 3.0. BACKBONE (PHI/PSI) DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS WERE OBTAINED FROM TALOSplus. FINAL STRUCTURE QUALITY FACTORS (FOR RESIDUE NUMBERS 1 TO 183, PSVS 1.4), WHERE ORDERED RESIDUES [S(PHI) + S(PSI) > 1.8] COMPRISE: 2-12,18-38,66-106,111-146,152-162,164-181: (A) RMSD (ORDERED RESIDUES): BB, 1.0, HEAVY ATOM, 1.6. (B) MOLPROBITY RAMACHANDRAN STATISTICS FOR ORDERED RESIDUES: MOST FAVORED, 96.8%, ALLOWED, 2.9%, DISALLOWED, 0.2%. (C) PROCHECK SCORES FOR ORDERED RESIDUES (RAW/Z-): PHI-PSI, -0.28/-0.79, ALL, -0.26/-1.54. (D) MOLPROBITY CLASH SCORE (RAW/Z-): 15.30/-1.10 (E) NUMBER OF CLOSE CONTACTS PER 20 MODELS: 40. (F) AGREEMENT WITH N-H RESIDUAL DIPOLAR COUPLINGS: CORRELATION COEFFICIENT (R): 0.985; Qrms: 0.171. THE C-TERMINAL HIS TAG RESIDUES OF THE PROTEIN (HHHHHH) WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE STRUCTURE CALCULATIONS AND HAVE BEEN OMITTED FROM THIS DEPOSITION. COORDINATES FOR THE FOLLOWING RESIDUES ARE NOT WELL DETERMINED [S(PHI) + S(PSI) < 1.8]: 1,13-17,39-65,107-110,147-151,163,182-183.
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1refinementCNS1.3Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2structure solutionCNS1.3Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
3geometry optimizationCNS1.3Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4structure solutionCYANA3.0Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5processingNMRPipe2.3Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
6data collectionTopSpin2.1Bruker Biospin
7data collectionVnmrJVarian
8chemical shift assignmentPINE1.0Bahrami, Markley, Assadi, and Eghbalnia
9data analysisSparky3Goddard
10peak pickingSparky3Goddard
11dihedral angle constraintsTALOS+Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
12rdc analysisPALESPALES (Zweckstetter, Bax)
13structure validationPSVS1.4Bhattacharya, Montelione
14quality assessmentPSVS1.4Bhattacharya, Montelione
15data analysisPdbStat5.5Tejero, Montelione
16structure validationMolProbity3.19Richardson
17quality assessmentMolProbity3.19Richardson