6O22

Structure of Asf1-H3:H4-Rtt109-Vps75 histone chaperone-lysine acetyltransferase complex with the histone substrate.


SOLUTION NMR - SOLUTION SCATTERING
Solution Scattering Data Acquistion123456
Scattering Typeneutronneutronneutronneutronneutronneutron
Radiation/Neutron SourceILLFRM2FRM2FRM2FRM2FRM2
SynchrotronNNNNNN
Beamline Type
Detector TypeHe multidetector 128 linear sensitive Reuter-Stokes detector6Li-Scintillator 1 mm thickness + photomultiplier detector6Li-Scintillator 1 mm thickness + photomultiplier detector6Li-Scintillator 1 mm thickness + photomultiplier detector6Li-Scintillator 1 mm thickness + photomultiplier detector6Li-Scintillator 1 mm thickness + photomultiplier detector
Detector Manufacturer Details
Temperature (K)298298298298298298
pH6.56.56.56.56.56.5
Numer of Time Frames Used
Protein Concentration Range (mg/mL)4.902.353.853.84.75.2
Sample Buffer50 MM CITRATE, 150 MM NACL, 5MM BME IN 99.9% D2O50 MM CITRATE, 150 MM NACL, 5MM BME IN 99.9% D2O50 MM CITRATE, 150 MM NACL, 5MM BME IN 99.9% D2O50 MM CITRATE, 150 MM NACL, 5MM BME IN 99.9% D2O50 MM CITRATE, 150 MM NACL, 5MM BME IN 99.9% D2O50 MM CITRATE, 150 MM NACL, 5MM BME IN 99.9% D2O
Data Reduction SoftwareILL IN-HOUSE PACKAGE (GRASP)QTIKWSQTIKWSQTIKWSQTIKWSQTIKWS
Guiner Mean Radius Of Gyration (nm)2.843.533.283.53.06
Sigma Mean Radius Of Gyration0.0180.0380.0460.0460.076
R(XS-1) Mean Cross Sectional Radii (nm)
R(XS-1) Sigma Mean Cross Sectional Radii
R(XS-2) Mean Cross Sectional Radii (nm)
R(XS-2) Sigma Mean Cross Sectional Radii
P(R) Protein Length (nm)9.511.510.511.010.5
Solution Scattering Data Analysis and Model Fitting
MethodSoftwareSoftware AuthorsStarting ModelConformers, Number CalculatedConformers, Number SubmittedConformers, Selection CriteriaBest Representative ConformerOther Details
X-RAY STRUCTURES OF THE SUBUNITS WERE DOCKED WITH HADDOCK-BASED M3 DOCKING PROTOCOL. DOCKING WAS GUIDED BY PRE DISTANCE RESTRAINTS, STRUCTURES WERE SELECTED BY FITNESS TO THE SANS DATA.M3KARACA, CARLOMAGNO, RODRIGUES, BONVINPDB ID 3Q66, PDB ID 2HUE1501BEST FITNESS TO THE SANS DATA, CLOSEST TO THE CLUSTER CENTER.THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING A HADDOCK-BASED M3 DOCKING PROTOCOL. THE INITIAL COORDINATES OF THE ISOLATED DOMAINS WERE BASED ON PDB ID 3Q66, PDB ...THE STRUCTURE WAS DETERMINED USING A HADDOCK-BASED M3 DOCKING PROTOCOL. THE INITIAL COORDINATES OF THE ISOLATED DOMAINS WERE BASED ON PDB ID 3Q66, PDB ID 2HUE. PRE DISTANCE RESTRAINTS WERE USED FOR STRUCTURE CALCULATION WITH HADDOCK-M3. 5000 STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED DURING THE IT0 STAGE, 150 STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED DURING THE IT1 STAGE. SANS DATA WERE USED FOR THE STRUCTURE SELECTION.
NMR Experiment
ExperimentTypeSample ContentsSolventIonic StrengthpHPressureTemperature (K)Spectrometer
12D 1H-13C HSQC70 uM ILV methyl labelled, perdeuterated Vps75 (dimer), 70 uM Rtt109, 70 uM Asf1, 70 uM H3, 70 uM H4100% D2O150 mM6.51 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 850
22D 1H-13C HSQC70 uM ILV methyl labelled, perdeuterated Vps75 (dimer), 70 uM Rtt109, 70 uM Asf1, 70 uM H3(110A,63C) mutant with a cysteine coupled to a paramagnetic tag, 70 uM H4100% D2O150 mM6.51 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 850
32D 1H-13C HSQC90 uM ILV methyl labelled, perdeuterated Vps75 (dimer), 90 uM Rtt109, 90 uM Asf1, 90 uM H3(110A,76C) mutant with a cysteine coupled to a paramagnetic tag, 90 uM H4100% D2O150 mM6.51 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 850
42D 1H-13C HSQC30 uM ILV methyl labelled, perdeuterated Vps75 (dimer), 30 uM Rtt109, 30 uM Asf1, 30 uM H3, 30 uM H4(30C) mutant with a cysteine coupled to a paramagnetic tag100% D2O150 mM6.51 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 850
52D 1H-13C HSQC70 uM ILV methyl labelled, perdeuterated Vps75 (dimer), 70 uM Rtt109, 70 uM Asf1, 70 uM H3, 70 uM H4(82C) mutant with a cysteine coupled to a paramagnetic tag100% D2O150 mM6.51 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 850
62D 1H-13C HSQC80 uM ILV methyl labelled, perdeuterated Vps75 (dimer), 80 uM Rtt109, 80 uM Asf1, 80 uM H3, 80 uM H4(45C) mutant with a cysteine coupled to a paramagnetic tag100% D2O150 mM6.51 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 850
72D 1H-13C HSQC30 uM ILV methyl labelled, perdeuterated Vps75 (dimer), 30 uM Rtt109, 30 uM Asf1, 30 uM H3, 30 uM H4(93C) mutant with a cysteine coupled to a paramagnetic tag100% D2O150 mM6.51 atm298Bruker AVANCE III 850
NMR Spectrometer Information
SpectrometerManufacturerModelField Strength
1BrukerAVANCE III850
NMR Refinement
MethodDetailsSoftware
simulated annealingAmber
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteriastructures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number150
Conformers Submitted Total Number1
Representative Model1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
#ClassificationVersionSoftware NameAuthor
1data analysisCcpNMRCCPN
2structure calculationHADDOCKBonvin
3processingNMRPipeDelaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
4processingTopSpinBruker Biospin
5refinementAmberCase, Darden, Cheatham III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, and Kollman
6data analysisFuDAD. Flemming Hansen