2EZL

SOLUTION NMR STRUCTURE OF THE IBETA SUBDOMAIN OF THE MU END DNA BINDING DOMAIN OF PHAGE MU TRANSPOSASE, 29 STRUCTURES

SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment	Type	Sample Contents	Solvent	Ionic Strength	pH	Pressure	Temperature (K)	Spectrometer
1	TRIPLE RESONANCE FOR ASSIGNMENT OF PROTEIN: CBCA(CO)NH				6.3		303
2	CBCANH				6.3		303
3	HBHA(CO)NH				6.3		303
4	C(CO)NH				6.3		303
5	H(CCO)NH				6.3		303
6	HCCH-COSY				6.3		303
7	HCCH-TOCSY				6.3		303
8	HNHA				6.3		303
9	15N-SEPARATED HOHAHA; QUANTITATIVE J CORRELATION FOR COUPLING CONSTANTS; 3D 15N-SEPARATED NOE				6.3		303
10	3D 13C-SEPARATED NOE AND ROE				6.3		303
11	4D 15N/13C-SEPARATED NOE				6.3		303
12	4D 13C/13C-SEPARATED NOE EXPERIMENTS				6.3		303

NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer	Manufacturer	Model	Field Strength
1	Bruker	AMX500	500
2	Bruker	AMX600	600

NMR Refinement
Method	Details	Software
simulated annealing	THE 3D STRUCTURE OF THE IBETA SUBDOMAIN OF MU A TRANSPOSASE WAS SOLVED BY MULTI-DIMENSIONAL HETERONUCLEAR NMR AND IS BASED ON 1446 EXPERIMENTAL NMR RESTRAINTS: 255 SEQUENTIAL (\|I- J\|=1), 220 MEDIUM RANGE (1 < \|I-J\| <=5) AND 252 LONG RANGE (\|I-J\| >5) INTERRESIDUES AND 234 INTRARESIDUE APPROXIMATE INTERPROTON DISTANCE RESTRAINTS; 52 DISTANCE RESTRAINTS FOR 26 BACKBONE H-BONDS;. 153 TORSION ANGLE RESTRAINTS (94 PHI, 8 PSI, 36 CHI1 AND 15 CHI2); 58 THREE-BOND HN-HA COUPLING CONSTANT RESTRAINTS; AND 180 (92 CALPHA AND 88 CBETA) 13C SHIFT RESTRAINTS. THE STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL OF NILGES ET AL. (1988) FEBS LETT. 229, 129-136 USING THE PROGRAM X-PLOR 3.1 (BRUNGER) MODIFIED TO INCORPORATE COUPLING CONSTANT (GARRETT ET AL. (1984) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 104, 99-103) AND CARBON CHEMICAL SHIFT (KUSZEWSKI ET AL. (1995) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 106, 92-96) RESTRAINTS, AND A CONFORMATIONAL DATABASE POTENTIAL (KUSZEWSKI ET AL.(1996) PROTEIN SCI. 5, 1067-1080; KUSZEWSKI ET AL. (1997) J. MAGN. RESON 125, 171-177). THE RESTRAINED REGULARIZED MEAN STRUCTURE IS PRESENTED IN ENTRY 2EZK AND 29 STRUCTURES ARE PRESENTED IN ENTRY 2EZL, AND THE EXPERIMENTAL RESTRAINTS IN R2EZKMR. IN THE RESTRAINED REGULARIZED MEAN COORDINATES (2EZK) THE LAST COLUMN REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE RMS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL SIMULATED ANNEALING STRUCTURES AND THE MEAN COORDINATE POSITIONS. THE LAST COLUMN IN THE INDIVIDUAL SA THE STRUCTURES (2EZI) HAS NO MEANING. BEST FITTING TO GENERATE AVERAGE STRUCTURE IS WITH RESPECT TO RESIDUES 89 - 166. RESIDUES 76 - 88 AND 167 - 174 AT THE N- AND C-TERMINI ARE POORLY DEFINED BY THE EXPERIMENTAL DATA. NOTE THE OCCUPANCY FIELD HAS NO MEANING. RMSD IN BONDS,ANGLES,IMPROPERS,CDIH,NOE,COUP: 2808E-03,0.871524,1.02906,0.295155,2.337017E-02,0.902726 SHIFTS RMS A, B: 1.04343, 1.11143	X-PLOR (SEE ABOVE)

NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria
Conformers Calculated Total Number	29
Conformers Submitted Total Number	29

Computation: NMR Software
#	Classification	Version	Software Name	Author
1	structure solution	X-PLOR (SEE ABOVE)	ABOVE)
2	refinement	X-PLOR (SEE ABOVE)	ABOVE)

RCSB PDB Core Operations are funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (DBI-2321666), the US Department of Energy (DE-SC0019749), and the National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant R01GM157729.