1J11

beta-amylase from Bacillus cereus var. mycoides in complex with alpha-EPG


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.246 (Depositor), 0.220 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.200 (Depositor), 0.180 (DCC) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted EPGClick on this verticalbar to view details

This is version 1.5 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Crystal Structures of beta-Amylase from Bacillus cereus var. mycoides in Complexes with Substrate Analogs and Affinity-Labeling Reagents

Oyama, T.Miyake, H.Kusunoki, M.Nitta, Y.

(2003) J Biochem 133: 467-474

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvg061
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1J0Y, 1J0Z, 1J10, 1J11, 1J12

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The crystal structures of beta-amylase from Bacillus cereus var. mycoides in complexes with five inhibitors were solved. The inhibitors used were three substrate analogs, i.e. glucose, maltose (product), and a synthesized compound, O-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-(1-->4)-O-alpha-D-glucopyranosyl-(1-->4)-D-xylopyranose (GGX), and two affinity-labeling reagents with an epoxy alkyl group at the reducing end of glucose. For all inhibitors, one molecule was bound at the active site cleft and the non-reducing end glucose of the four inhibitors except GGX was located at subsite 1, accompanied by a large conformational change of the flexible loop (residues 93-97), which covered the bound inhibitor. In addition, another molecule of maltose or GGX was bound about 30 A away from the active site. A large movement of residues 330 and 331 around subsite 3 was also observed upon the binding of GGX at subsites 3 to 5. Two affinity-labeling reagents, alpha-EPG and alpha-EBG, were covalently bound to a catalytic residue (Glu-172). A substrate recognition mechanism for the beta-amylase was discussed based on the modes of binding of these inhibitors in the active site cleft.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Laboratory of Enzyme Chemistry, Graduate School of Agriculture and Biological Science, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531. nitta@biochem.osakafu-u.ac.jp


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Beta-amylase
A, B, C, D
516Bacillus cereusMutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.2.1.2
UniProt
Find proteins for P36924 (Bacillus cereus)
Explore P36924 
Go to UniProtKB:  P36924
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP36924
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 2 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
EPG
Query on EPG

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
E [auth A],
G [auth B],
I [auth C],
K [auth D]
(2R)-oxiran-2-ylmethyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside
C9 H16 O7
NXJZWOCFSMYDAS-NZJLWHDDSA-N
CA
Query on CA

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
F [auth A],
H [auth B],
J [auth C],
L [auth D]
CALCIUM ION
Ca
BHPQYMZQTOCNFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.246 (Depositor), 0.220 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.200 (Depositor), 0.180 (DCC) 
Space Group: C 1 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 177.9α = 90
b = 112.9β = 105.8
c = 146.2γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
X-PLORmodel building
X-PLORrefinement
X-PLORphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted EPGClick on this verticalbar to view details

Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2003-06-17
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-27
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2020-07-29
    Type: Remediation
    Reason: Carbohydrate remediation
    Changes: Data collection, Derived calculations, Structure summary
  • Version 1.4: 2023-10-25
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Refinement description, Structure summary
  • Version 1.5: 2024-10-30
    Changes: Structure summary