Skip to main content

 9TW1 | pdb_00009tw1

structure of Fab 4012 alone


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.70 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.215 (Depositor), 0.217 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.181 (Depositor), 0.185 (DCC) 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation 3D Report Full Report

Validation slider image for 9TW1

This is version 1.0 of the entry. See complete history. 

Literature

Antibody CDR-H3 loop flexibility: Insights from X-ray crystallography, structural bioinformatics, and the limits of current deep learning methods.

Barozet, A., Mathieu, M., Papin, D., Cameron, B., Dabdoubi, T., Severac, A., Ferrari, P., Simeon, T., Bianciotto, M., Cortes, J.

(2026) J Struct Biol 218: 108368-108368

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2026.108368
  • Primary Citation Related Structures: 
    9TVR, 9TVZ, 9TW1, 9TW7

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Complementarity Determining Regions (CDRs) in antibodies, and in particular the CDR-H3 loop, often display conformational plasticity that is essential for their function. Due to this flexibility, the structural investigation of antibody-antigen binding cannot exclusively rely on experimental techniques that only provide snapshots of unbound and bound states, such as X-ray crystallography. Moreover, X-ray structures can be biased due to experimental conditions and crystal packing. In this context, computational techniques, and especially conformational sampling methods, are an essential complement to experiments. This work illustrates the interest of such a coupling of methods on the structural investigation of an anti-FGFR4 (Fibroblast growth factor receptor 4) antibody. X-ray crystallography experiments revealed a very significant conformational change of the CDR-H3 loop between unbound and bound states. Structural bioinformatics methods were then applied to provide a more global picture of the conformational space of this loop, and to confirm that the observed conformations were not the result of experimental artifacts. The experimental unbound conformation was reliably predicted, and the loop conformation observed in the bound state was also predicted to be a probable conformation in the absence of the antigen. The possible existence of a third low-energy conformation, for which there is currently no experimental evidence, was substantiated by molecular simulations. We also applied recent methods based on deep learning techniques to evaluate their ability to predict conformations of the H3 loop. The results show that while these methods are very effective at predicting the structure of rigid/stable regions of proteins, they still have difficulties in accurately representing regions with more variable structure, such as this loop. Overall, this work shows that the structural study of flexible proteins remains an open field of research, and that the synergistic coupling of experimental and computational methods is essential in this context.


  • Organizational Affiliation: 
    • Université de Toulouse, CNRS, LAAS, Toulouse, France; Sanofi Recherche & Développement, Integrated Drug Discovery, Molecular Design Sciences, 13 quai Jules Guesde, BP 14, 94403 Vitry-sur-Seine Cedex, France. Electronic address: abarozet@gmail.com.

Macromolecule Content 

  • Total Structure Weight: 47.47 kDa 
  • Atom Count: 3,774 
  • Modeled Residue Count: 432 
  • Deposited Residue Count: 434 
  • Unique protein chains: 2

Macromolecules

Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Light Chain of Fab 4012A [auth L]213Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence
Find similar proteins by:|  3D Structure
Entity ID: 2
MoleculeChains  Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Heavy Chain of Fab 4012B [auth H]221Mus musculusMutation(s): 0 
Entity Groups
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
Sequence Annotations
Expand
Reference Sequence

Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.70 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.215 (Depositor), 0.217 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.181 (Depositor), 0.185 (DCC) 
Space Group: P 21 21 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 55.709α = 90
b = 86.737β = 90
c = 97.136γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
BUSTERrefinement
XDSdata reduction
SCALAdata scaling
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Entry History 

& Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
Not funded--

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2026-10-07
    Type: Initial release